It keeps being proven that DEI is a waste of money and is of
dubious logic, but the Department of Interior DEI office went above and beyond
to prove both. They decided the law was something to make up and just created
their own little world. The Interior Inspector General found that this was done
for three years, with the DEI department working to make sure that they would
not be discovered by the Equal Employment Commission.
Three Years
Here via the Department of Interior OIG report, is what was
happening in the Interior DEI office.
“We investigated an allegation that a former Director
(Director) of the Office of Diversity, Inclusion and Civil Rights (ODICR)
issued final agency decisions (FADs) containing unsupportable findings of
discrimination. We also investigated an allegation that the Director, another
former senior official with ODICR (Acting Director), and the former Director of
ODICR’s Adjudication, Compliance & Equity Division (Division Director)
backdated or ordered employees to backdate FADs to avoid reporting the untimely
issuance of FADs to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC).”
“We concluded that, between September 2019 and September
2021, the Director did not apply the correct legal standard when considering
discrimination complaints filed against the U.S. Department of the Interior
(DOI) and moreover instructed ODICR staff to use the same incorrect legal
standard in their consideration of discrimination complaints. As a result,
ODICR issued FADs that found that the DOI had engaged in unlawful
discrimination in cases where such a finding may not have been made had ODICR
applied the correct legal standard. We also concluded that, between June 2018
and September 2021, four ODICR officials—the Director, Acting Director,
Division Director, and the Affirmative Employment Program Division Director
(Program Director)—backdated FADs and that this created the appearance that
those FADs had been issued timely.”
“Shortly after we discovered that ODICR was using an
incorrect legal standard to decide claims of discrimination, we notified DOI
officials so they could take appropriate action. We understand that the DOI
took immediate action to correct ODICR’s use of the incorrect legal standard,
and we confirmed that ODICR is no longer applying this incorrect standard to
discrimination claims. Similarly, during our investigation, ODICR revised its
EEO Complaints Processing Handbook to expressly prohibit backdating (the
practice of using a signature date on a FAD that precedes the FAD issuance
date) and to make clear that the FAD issuance date is the date the FAD is
issued by ODICR rather than the date the ODICR Director signs the FAD. We make
six recommendations that will promote use of the correct legal standard to
determine FADs and adherence to appropriate timelines.”
Specific Actions
Via the same report, here is what they were specifically
doing.
“During this investigation, we focused on a selection of
FADs that ODICR issued between June 2018 and September 2021 that included
findings of discrimination. More specifically, we focused primarily but not
exclusively on FADs and related documents that included language suggesting
application of the incorrect legal standard—namely, the phrase “in the light
most favorable to the complainant.” We also assessed closely FADs that any of
the four ODICR officials signed, reviewing the signature dates on the FADs and
other evidence for examples of backdating.”
DEI keeps being proven to be bad on a legal standpoint, with
it being more focused on wanting people to be victims than being productive members
of society. This allowed people to lie and attack people who they want to. It
is time that this trend ends, as it is more of a waste of time and tax dollars
than anything close to being valid.
See my content at: https://www.facebook.com/PaulShannonRamblings/
Help support me at: https://www.patreon.com/FreedomVN
Comments
Post a Comment