I saw the news that there is now a Defense Modernization Caucus that has been created by Representatives Pat Ryan (D-NY) and Rob Wittman (R-VA). This caused me to look into how many caucuses there currently are, and the only word to use is wow. There are caucuses from the Candy Caucus to the Electronic Warfare Working Group. In one sense, it is good there are some discussions on issues people are interested in, while it makes one wonder if they are actually effective.
Knowledge Helps
One good thing about the different caucuses is that they can pool their knowledge and their contact lists. Knowledge helps bring about more informed bills that can help the nation on many issues. People will know that their politicians are getting help when they have an important local issue while being able to put it into the context of larger national ones. In theory, all of this is a good thing.
Corruption Chances
Another way to look at the caucuses is a chance for large companies and groups to find out who they can target for donations and gifts to get them to vote for the goals of these folks. While it is doubtful that the 4-H Caucus, Adult Literacy Caucus, or Apiary and Beekeeper Caucus are spreading the wealth in a way that is causing corruption, other groups may see far more benefits. These benefits are not easily found, but it is well known that they happen.
Congressional Life
One of the problems of being a member of Congress is that there is a definite disconnect between those elected and those whom they represent. Caucuses are just another way that politicians are getting farther from their districts and states, in some cases. People need to make sure that their representatives are focusing on what is helpful to states or districts before they focus on other matters. The caucuses can be a great way for this to happen, but they can also veer them in new directions that are not as helpful.
Networking Helps
There is a definite need for Congress to understand how the military needs to modernize, there are already several caucuses that are focused on several areas of the military. It does help with networking, which can be used to help constituents. This many caucuses can also help with their ability to fundraise. It is up to the voters to pay attention so that it is a benefit in the right way.
This is another area that the voters need to pay attention to, but it does not mean close scrutiny. People need to build communities that the politicians want to be close to, which means they will not stray. There needs to be a community for them to come home to, which means they will spend more time in their districts and states. We, the voters, have as many responsibilities as those we elect.

I understand their intent which is provide additional focus on a given issue, which I think is a good thing in general. However, a caucus focused on exclusively on race to the exclusion of others I think leads to a form of racism. Rather than have a black, Asian, Hispanic, or Native American caucus (but explicitly no "white" caucus) instead if a racial equality or a diversity caucus is wrong. The other problem is implied or even subtle favoritism. That's not the purpose of Congress, which is to act on issues equally, although there's occasionally the need to have a temporary "focus group" to look at specific aspects of an issue.
ReplyDelete